Is Religion Just About Sex and Guns? posted by Yosef Kanefsky

When a candidate runs as a devoutly religious person, what kinds of public positions does he or she take? In the political contest playing out in presently, the foreign policy positions of the devoutly religious are hawkish, and their social policy positions are conservative. The devoutly religious politician is anti-abortion, anti-contraception, and anti-feminism. The same general pattern (with shades of difference) holds true among devoutly religious politicians in many other countries, regardless of which one of the world’s major religions is being practiced there.

 Is this the only voice that the devoutly religious can bring to the political sphere? We know that it isn’t. When Isaiah brought his voice to the political sphere for example, he spoke neither of God’s demand that we utilize military force to uproot idolaters, nor of the need to insure that our womenfolk are properly chaste. He spoke instead about how the widows and orphans can’t get justice, how small landowners are being forced off their land by the larger, more powerful owners, and how the elite political class is too self-absorbed in material pleasure to care or even know. He spoke of the urgent need to fill the world with knowledge of God so that warfare would become obsolete. He cautioned against reflexively seeking military solutions to all threats, emphasizing that the nation’s security will ultimately be determined by its pursuit of social righteousness and its consciousness of God. 

There is no shortage, tragically, of evils in today’s world.  Every devoutly religious person is undoubtedly moved by and concerned about the fact that 15 million American children live in poverty, that 40 % of minority students nationally aren’t graduating high school. Every devoutly religious person can’t help but be horrified at the rape and killing of women and children in the Congo or in Southern Sudan, or by the carnage created by the drug wars just south of our border – drug wars funded by drug consumption here at home. Wouldn’t it be inspiring if these issues were the ones most that were central to the platforms of our devoutly religious politicians? Which is not at all to say that the defense of our homeland, the thwarting of terrorism and the promotion of a sexual ethic that honors sacred relationships, are not vitally important issues as well. But they occupy just a portion of what the religious person sees when he looks out at the world and the people who live inhabit it.

I am a devoutly religious person.  And I believe that our deepest religious values should inform our political views. And I am befuddled and disturbed by the fact that our leaders who wear their religion on their sleeves, exhaust their passions on our military challenges abroad and birth-control pills at home. The world awaits the expression of America’s deep historical religious passions for justice, compassion, and peace for all humankind.

4 Responses to Is Religion Just About Sex and Guns? posted by Yosef Kanefsky

  1. […] to infuse politics with a spirit of social justice, as opposed to sexual repression and gun rights: Like this:LikeBe the first to like this […]

  2. David Meir says:

    Thank you Rabbi Kanefsky for voicing this – so very true!

    I would add that it’s not only “issues” related to violence and sex which dominate the conversation, but also that the very manner in which the conversation is conducted is itself violent and immodest.

    The political rhetoric even among the most “devoutly” religious is often highly aggressive, cutting and vicious, as well as shamelessly haughty, obscenely prideful, brazenly self-righteous.

    Religious values like humility, kindness, modesty, softness and compassion need to come through first and foremost in the way we conduct ourselves, the way we speak to and interact with others.

    If our discourse could be infused with even a bit more compassion and humility, I believe that would make it much easier for people to see beyond their side of the fence and take a more holistic religious approach to the issues – as you so aptly suggest.

  3. Anonymous says:

    We seem to have a modern culture that is filled with cultural pollution in form of violence and sex. Thus it is natural for our children to be attracted to “McWorld”. The problem is that McWorld is much like the ocean. Fun to swim in, useful to ship good across but caustic to live in.

    We seem to disassociate violence from sex. But both come from the same hormones. If one does not have self discipline over ones sex life then one also does not discipline the violence that lives with sex. What makes a man want a woman also makes him want to kill any male competitors.

    It may well be that in Isaiah’s time that the people had discipline over their sexual life and self control over violence thus the freedom to be concerned about other matters. And, yes, we should be concerned about fairness. But not at the price of being undisciplined.

    BTW, violence should a tool but used wisely. At the moment, due to so many being undisciplined in their sex lives, too many run in fear of the “beast within”.

  4. David Steele says:

    I think that the Haredi are focused on being pure. To be live the Levites of old who spent their time in study and living a pure life of service. While I see this article as being skewed (rather poor journalism), it does show the heart of those who dedicate themselves to purity.

    Is purity at odds with compassion?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: