Avoiding the comforts of extremism

Sometimes the middle path is perceived as that which is noncommittal and lacking passion.   But in the realm of religion the opposite is true.  It is moderate positions that require more passion and commitment because they tend to be less black and white and thus harder to balance.  Extreme ideas in contrast are easy to grasp and hold onto.

Within Judaism, especially within more traditional arenas, there is disagreement regarding to what extent one should put up isolationist walls as a bulwark against western culture for fear of it compromising one’s religious values, or be open to outside people and ideas.

Sometimes those who form more extreme insular communities are seen as more pious.   In truth though, every stricture, every religious piety comes with an equal and opposite religious compromise not as readily apparent.  For instance, the more isolated and protected a community is the more they may retain their exclusive religious values, but at the same time their religious values will be less able to impact the outside world and thus less able to render them a “Light unto the nations” or as God put the Jewish mission to Abraham in the book of Genesis, “A blessing to all the families of the earth.”

Rabbi Marc Angel makes this point well in a recent article about Passover in the Jerusalem post http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=217325 in which he writes that true religious life is balanced, not veering to the side of “ice” or skepticism and hedonism, nor toward the side of “fire” or religious passion that expresses itself as fanaticism and isolationism.

Yet it is hard to stand for moderation and balance, it is much easier, and I would add more sexy, to take extreme positions.   The extremes of “ice” or of “fire” are less complex and at the extremes we are prone to see ourselves as self righteous, a position that, while locking out others, usually makes us feel pretty good.

2 Responses to Avoiding the comforts of extremism

  1. Dr. Saundra Sterling Epstein says:

    Black or white are easier to decipher and distinguish. We are taught that when G-d divided all, this was precisely NOT the type of division in Bereshit (with shamayim and mayim, and choshech and or being seen in terms of not only themselves but each other and in each going through the process of becoming the other, as reflected in the order and content of prayers that we recite as the beginning part of Shema u’Birchoteha) and yet this is precisely the type of division and divisiveness too many see too often. For those of us who believe in, value and cherish the variegated shades of grey and hold onto this continuum PASSIONATELY, it is not so easy to navigate the BLACK OR WHITE ways of our world. May G-d continue to give us strength to do so.

    Dr. Saundra Sterling Epstein
    Director, BeYachad

  2. […] Avoiding the comforts of extremism, a post by Rabbi Hyim Shafner […]

Leave a Reply to Weekly Review with Blue Flowers | Ilana-Davita Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: