However, I posed a number of questions in response to a series of articles by Rabbi Kanefsky about expanding market share of Orthodoxy. Your response does not engage on any of my questions, but merely rehashes the reasons we are both interested in this project to begin with.

The intent of my post is to throw up some issues or obstacles which I see in Orthodoxy expanding market share as articulated in Rabbi Kanefsky’s post

(1) Who is the marginal you member you are after? This reads more like strategy to decapitate the intellectual top of the Conservative movement, which is numerically quite small.
(2) Let’s assume some people switch from Reform, Reconstructionist, Conservative or whatever to Orthodoxy on the basis of the principles you are articulating. What kind of relationship can they possibly have to mainstream and right-wing Orthodoxy? Hyphenated Orthodoxy is still Orthodoxy. But how do you expect them to embrace hyphenated Orthodoxy if their views are marginalized or simply rejected as heretical by many Orthodox Jews? Are you dropping intra-Orthodox solidarity as a prerequisite for the new adherent and the new movement?
(3) Movement / denomination: It would seem readily apparent that not all of Orthodoxy will sign on to this agenda, and that it is already creating a rift in Orthodoxy. Question: How much of a movement will the additional member have who comes to Orthodoxy or Morethodoxy as an ardent adherent to the principles you are articulating? And, to what extent will the rest of the Orthodox world regard such a movement as Orthodox? In other words, why would an intellectual Conservative Jew leave his movement to join a small marginal movement, which is viewed with hostility by the very peers (mainstream and right-wing) that it espouses to be a part of?